From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 2 10:26:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B703A0; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 10:26:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fk@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74B312D5; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 10:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [78.35.145.12] (helo=fabiankeil.de) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1UtxaA-0003lC-Nx; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 12:13:10 +0200 Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:13:14 +0200 From: Fabian Keil To: Hiroki Sato Subject: Re: bin/180164: [patch][regression] swapon segfault after r252310 Message-ID: <20130702121313.2b301eef@fabiankeil.de> In-Reply-To: <20130702.150659.1810937955679001492.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <201307012120.r61LK12j014536@freefall.freebsd.org> <20130702.150659.1810937955679001492.hrs@allbsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/f=2OW1.EuG/BZ_3qyUKPuai"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: MTgwOTA5 Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, delphij@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 10:26:12 -0000 --Sig_/f=2OW1.EuG/BZ_3qyUKPuai Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hiroki Sato wrote: > delphij@freebsd.org wrote > in <201307012120.r61LK12j014536@freefall.freebsd.org>: >=20 > de> I believe I have fixed this with in the refactor done in > de> r252388. Please retest a newer -CURRENT version and let > de> me know if the problem still persists. I can confirm that the regression is fixed in r252388. Thanks. > > It now enables authentication which reduces the available swap space. >=20 > More specifics about this? This commit should not change the old > behavior for encrypted swap space configuration. If there is > something wrong except for SIGSEGV, I would like to know what it is. When I wrote "now", I was referring to a system based on r252369. Authentication is no longer enabled by default after r252388, so this issue no longer exists either. Fabian --Sig_/f=2OW1.EuG/BZ_3qyUKPuai Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJR0qe6AAoJEGkYIpGLojccRVkP/0QeIHCcNc/qaKgP2qKZAv2Z HXQ3UjbFO7YFpTwBM2DIW0iRiUoPb6VtfdkZLfW7Ne4Oln62xh0YGARMTjZo0hjp CH696HwZxZj+VbXOcA6LO5h49Z/tWQ4XvEGratUmi/KtAYxryCvAO/N0M/SWnDLS OFPdQnt8o5DieyzEMz8StOtR+PNQMADlu3X47CbOuEwtbaa+BBhkybcVNT0BqABo 3lo24m/YYNHx7JB2lnzJnhHEa0MutAEZBelVc1nYwGjQ/gwlurPTTMzh0igyv6t5 0orxbufV6tHrxJ+B1qBzy8QE/mSBTq0xdy/t3KUp9zL4ukV4F32Airiu+EMJ2vJM IacAumEMmYxSE6dEtBctHKotN9aQLdKPRDJ2vID9AkHgYYBVxyZqACqfz+8Uwg79 Yx6f6oHdO7wui2t/iYT+NTFNou8xzQLyDG6V9l0AuwYA3ja97eJ6i2btOjuO20P3 OVp0pQuPWrV3+k9CaQS5JSLNfCTKrP+FjpPo4dY7m2aZgGNhGBScrWSzuzhQGpd4 UtJ8D6Yry0m/CwgFdzwIb0eALBVxqGE0v/XRM7OOcVSC5RcGNjx0oK101DG5c0yP mVzfb4PKnhu3kcxsXQqbGX9GiYiPdaV3Ynpw/CjNYpoeaQ9voSt4VRiQf7ZqRdQb Ki7flsqI7ycAVfziEBWZ =prLw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/f=2OW1.EuG/BZ_3qyUKPuai--