Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 14:02:01 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233360] [NEW PORT] security/otp: OTP tool Message-ID: <bug-233360-7788-5notdB3911@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-233360-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-233360-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233360 --- Comment #12 from J.R. Oldroyd <fbsd@opal.com> --- What can I do here? This port has both a command line and an X11 version. I did this using fla= vors and copied how to directly from the Porter's Handbook. Even so, apparently= the flavors were rejected. What is it that I am expected to do now? It also overloads do-fetch to pull the files directly from a subversion ser= ver rather than use the 1970's technology of tarballs. Tar files were great for when we exchanged software by means of receiving a magnetic tape at a conference!! I am prepared to argue elsewhere that we should add subversion fetch support directly to the ports framework. In the meantime, this do-fe= tch code works fine. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-233360-7788-5notdB3911>