From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar  3 08:44:46 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D42716A4CE
	for <threads@freebsd.org>; Thu,  3 Mar 2005 08:44:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.emict.com (brig.emict.com [212.90.172.42])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E14D43D41
	for <threads@freebsd.org>; Thu,  3 Mar 2005 08:44:43 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from andrit@ukr.net)
Received: from BORJA (unknown [203.199.120.221])
	by mail.emict.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B24337C3
	for <threads@freebsd.org>; Thu,  3 Mar 2005 10:44:39 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <010b01c51fcd$3d0dabb0$090210ac@BORJA>
From: "Andriy Tkachuk" <andrit@ukr.net>
To: <threads@freebsd.org>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0503021042310.26125-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
	<000b01c51fbb$4189ea30$090210ac@BORJA> <005201c51fc2$d8676b60$090210ac@BORJA>
	<4226C7B6.4060901@freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:14:30 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Subject: 
	Re: patch for threads/76690 - critical - fork hang in child for-lc_r
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 08:44:46 -0000

actually, this test prog was written after there were problems
with multithreaded domestic application server, that was tested under load.
this one is using intensively hash manipulations.
it is develped for redhat 7.3 and tested there.
it was interesting for me, how it will behaves on fbsd in
linux emulation - it was fine (note: there is linix pthreads).

then we wrote this test prog to investigate the threads with
heap manipulations sumultaneousely. It was interesting for
me to investigate the same in freebsd. that's how it was. :)

> Hmm,  libc_r and libpthread handle spinlock differently which malloc
> uses  to protect itself, some real world benchmarks are better than this.
> 
> David Xu