Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Jan 2013 07:32:46 +0100
From:      Artifex Maximus <artifexor@gmail.com>
To:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: recommendation instead of portmanager
Message-ID:  <CAPkuXvHiQyLi1T-3cA3%2Bm0coUN=g37M34AhCeRVjvn%2ByemGzRQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0A339689DD2763309568CF20@192.168.1.50>
References:  <CAPkuXvFYfpO3gO8Fmpse5oBLQ4CUtGjSPerKnENXdwZ-YmZv_g@mail.gmail.com> <0A339689DD2763309568CF20@192.168.1.50>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Daniel Staal <DStaal@usa.net> wrote:

> --As of January 11, 2013 11:07:58 PM +0100, Artifex Maximus is alleged to
> have said:
>
>  I am using portmanager for updating my ports. I love its -p switch. Is
>> there any similar program with such option? I am asking because
>> portmanager is gone from ports tree.
>>
>
> --As for the rest, it is mine.
>
> As of when?  I still see it.
>

ports tree revision 309992:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=309992

"2013-01-04 ports-mgmt/portmanager: Does not support modern ports features
such as MOVED, is lacking upstream and active contributions, and does not
support pkgng. Consider using ports-mgmt/portmaster, ports-mgmt/portupgrade
or pkgng."

Bye,
a



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPkuXvHiQyLi1T-3cA3%2Bm0coUN=g37M34AhCeRVjvn%2ByemGzRQ>