Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:57:18 -0700 From: "Brian W." <brian@brianwhalen.net> To: Waitman Gobble <gobble.wa@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why Clang Message-ID: <CADV=szW%2B1fP0UnqqdRR7bC7xU4an3dwHze4iKP_P5x49piMOvw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFuo_fwgVC9QHd2o3nWYqYnd3-VkSq%2BPMp14XhdjLKjLgzgSAw@mail.gmail.com> References: <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org> <CAFuo_fwgVC9QHd2o3nWYqYnd3-VkSq%2BPMp14XhdjLKjLgzgSAw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Waitman Gobble <gobble.wa@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 6, 2012 10:32 AM, "Thomas D. Dean" <tomdean@speakeasy.org> wrote: > > > > Has the discussion on why change to clang been made available? > > > > I would like to know the reasoning. > > > > Or, is it simply a gratuitous change? > > > > Tom Dean > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > i believe it at least partially has to do with license. FreeBSD does not > "ship" (maybe correct word?) with any GPLv3 licensed software. > > Waitman Gobble > San Jose California USA > _______________________________________________ > > It seems that GPLv3 and the desire to make clang the default in FreeBSD 10 are 2 of the reasons. Brian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADV=szW%2B1fP0UnqqdRR7bC7xU4an3dwHze4iKP_P5x49piMOvw>