Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 12:51:19 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 270478] Duplicated ARP reply sent from if_bridge member Message-ID: <bug-270478-227-7iI00i36Me@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-270478-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-270478-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D270478 --- Comment #2 from Zhenlei Huang <zlei@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Mina Gali=C4=87 from comment #1) > this setup seems odd. A short text diagram should show that clear. +-----------------------+ +---------+ | +---------+ | | | | | | | | epair0a -------------| | epair0b | bridge0 | | | | | | | +---------+ | +---------+ | 192.168.2.1/24 +-----------------------+ 192.168.2.2/24=20=20=20=20=20 > why is `ifconfig $epa inet 192.168.2.1/24` necessary? $epa is in host side, assign a ip address to trigger a ARP request. > only the bridge should need an IP, and i don't see that assignment The bridge and $epb is in jail side. > jexec $j ifconfig $b addm $epb > jexec $j ifconfig $epb up > jexec $j ifconfig $b inet 192.168.2.2/24 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-270478-227-7iI00i36Me>