From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 08:10:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: java@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA7C1065679 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 08:10:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51438FC1F for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 08:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA48AEV1013651 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 08:10:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oA48AERY013650; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 08:10:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 08:10:14 GMT Message-Id: <201011040810.oA48AERY013650@freefall.freebsd.org> To: java@FreeBSD.org From: Rob Farmer Cc: Subject: Re: ports/151923: [patch] java/openjdk6: free and native openjdk bootstrap X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Rob Farmer List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:10:15 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/151923; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Rob Farmer To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: Jung-uk Kim , David DEMELIER , bug-followup@freebsd.org, freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/151923: [patch] java/openjdk6: free and native openjdk bootstrap Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 01:06:29 -0700 On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 00:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Bootstrapping jdk has always been an issue because it depends on > non-free binary packages. Try to setup a package build cluster from > scratch it won't work =A0because of openjdk. > > This solution is the easiest way to get openjdk6 without too much pain > for the user. he will just have to portmaster java/openjdk6 or the way > they usually install ports on there systems without being forced to > install prebuilt dependencies or install non free software. Indeed - that's what I like about this - you can do everything within the normal ports work-flow - no using packages or dealing with the diablo distfiles. It would be much more seamless for users. In the suggested alternative, I would need to: 1) pkg_add openjdk 2) build openjdk from ports 3) uninstall openjdk from the package 4) install openjdk from the port portmaster/upgrade can help with 2-4 but it still need manual intervention beyond normal "make install clean." And of course it assumes I know this situation exists - if I don't, then I end up with an error related to fetching diablo distfiles that doesn't present a way forward, other than install diablo as a build dependency. Also, what about using the official packages from the cluster as the bootstrap instead? That would solve the problem of manually built packages getting behind. --=20 Rob Farmer