From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 28 08:37:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5405C106564A for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcoyles@horbury.wakefield.sch.uk) Received: from smtp1-wak.yhgfl.net (smtp3-wak-ext.yhgfl.net [89.207.208.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85D08FC08 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:37:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcoyles@horbury.wakefield.sch.uk) Received: from horbury.wakefield.sch.uk ([10.126.96.34]) by smtp1-wak.yhgfl.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m7S8bJMb031332; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:37:20 +0100 Received: from ITTEAM02 [10.126.96.253] by horbury.wakefield.sch.uk with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.07) id A3B960086; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:37:13 +0100 From: "Marc Coyles" To: "'Kris Kennaway'" Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:37:11 +0100 Message-ID: <000701c908e9$43d38e70$fd607e0a@Horbury.Internal> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 In-Reply-To: <48B6621C.3010604@FreeBSD.org> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-YHGfL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the YHGfL Foundation for more information X-YHGfL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-YHGfL-MailScanner-MCPCheck: MCP-Clean, MCP-Checker (score=0, required 0.5) X-YHGfL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-MailScanner-From: mcoyles@horbury.wakefield.sch.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Obscure df -h output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mcoyles@horbury.wakefield.sch.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:37:34 -0000 > Looks like they did some strange things trying to get it back. Those > look like nullfs mounts with the same source and destination, which > makes no sense. What does mount -v show you? > Hi Kris... [romarch@golem ~]$ mount -v /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local, writes: sync 715484 async 362440, reads: sync 16201 async 86) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) /dev/ad0s1g on /home (ufs, local, soft-updates, writes: sync 3879 async 1779995, reads: sync 876702 async 63257) /dev/ad0s1d on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates, writes: sync 23 async 145025, reads: sync 588 async 89) /dev/ad0s1e on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates, writes: sync 47 async 874619, reads: sync 495263 async 13857) /dev/ad0s1f on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates, writes: sync 360454 async 4721936, reads: sync 2557009 async 121766) devfs on /etc/namedb/dev (devfs, local) procfs on /proc (procfs, local) /libexec on libexec (nullfs, local) /lib on lib (nullfs, local) /usr/lib on usr/lib (nullfs, local) /usr/sbin on usr/sbin (nullfs, local) /usr/share on usr/share (nullfs, local) /usr/bin on usr/bin (nullfs, local) /usr/man on usr/man (nullfs, local) /usr/X11R6 on usr/X11R6 (nullfs, local) /usr/libexec on usr/libexec (nullfs, local) /usr/local/bin on usr/local/bin (nullfs, local) /usr/local/lib on usr/local/lib (nullfs, local) /var/spool on var/spool (nullfs, local) /var/lib on var/lib (nullfs, local) /var/run on var/run (nullfs, local) /var/log on var/log (nullfs, local) /home/tff on tff (nullfs, local) /tmp on tmp (nullfs, local) /dev on dev (nullfs, local) /bin on bin (nullfs, local) /proc on proc (nullfs, local) Marc A Coyles Horbury School ICT Support Team Mbl: 07850 518106 Land: 01924 282740 ext 730