From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 20:33:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE84106566C; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 20:33:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8CF8FC08; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 20:33:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwd18 with SMTP id wd18so15991695obb.13 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:33:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OvAJlXna3ilbGzz6rs1e58HQhI/YCI9oxYU6NuOearM=; b=d3bp0Ej8FPCsX4HLsIJEEZnEGcr9SMDG7xqhi1+BXY2T7bImlH5ckflKrIQ8FBA/n+ IDvQYawd8if/2K2T7eCQrMmWUT52LuBoqZLVyJk7A2BfV7SImjP/Zhn42PwnL87bGWCd yWkIuOoU5VRg5/Oe9xPlso60DfwvHUFMM7xuc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.193.99 with SMTP id hn3mr34869764obc.61.1325277233575; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:33:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.152.6 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:33:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111230195444.GA25204@FreeBSD.org> References: <201112301058.pBUAwFsw010478@svn.freebsd.org> <20111230195444.GA25204@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:33:53 -0800 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Alexey Dokuchaev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Ben Kaduk , Ulrich Spoerlein Subject: Re: svn commit: r228990 - in head/usr.sbin: IPXrouted adduser bluetooth/btpand bluetooth/sdpd bootparamd/bootparamd bsnmpd/modules/snmp_bridge bsnmpd/modules/snmp_hostres bsnmpd/modules/snmp_wlan bsnmp... X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 20:33:54 -0000 2011/12/30 Alexey Dokuchaev : > On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:43:22PM -0500, Ben Kaduk wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Ulrich Spoerlein wrot= e: >> > - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* is 11 bit wide that gives us upto 2= 048 chunks. >> > + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* is 11 bit wide that gives us up to = 2048 chunks. >> >> Should be "11 bits", no? > > I'm not a native speaker, but I think "11 bit wide" is correct here. =A0I > could have probably got into specifics, but simple googling for "16 ton s= hit > dropped on me" yielded 525M results, while the same phrase with "tons" on= ly > 18,9M. =A0:-^ bits is correct because it's the plural form of the word, but the sentence sounds off even with that change. This sounds better: "is 11-bits wide, which gives us up to 2048 chunks" The only question that lingers in my mind, is what does "chunks" qualify (buffer chunks? chunks of gold? chunks of rocca chocolate bars? etc)? Thanks, -Garrett