From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 12:09:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840F8A0D for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 12:09:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) Received: from nm12-vm3.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm12-vm3.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.218.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BC3FAF1 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 12:09:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.137.12.58] by nm12.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Feb 2013 12:06:19 -0000 Received: from [98.137.12.228] by tm3.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Feb 2013 12:06:19 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1036.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Feb 2013 12:06:19 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 127755.29003.bm@omp1036.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 48419 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Feb 2013 12:06:18 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1361621178; bh=lmN0ZnaGWFrUGbrsSRsSahT+oYAxoSJZzJSYnfVBuXY=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=aCfjFOuzjkNjtEdIekWJalfAvwl89aqf9ngpqKFRCBIY5rCCV68Bq/qTobmDvnbD7309VULQ2l3MyDgspfXDrRRW8R1XeddPglYs+OoH+W2Xi66du2qaTnCcnmgcW7nv5M6eotEXumNc/7RHCjY/FjW6+wC0rnz+E/F+1xYIiPU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RiwmOEHm1zF8AN0Q3eZrCr8eDLSn4UBqxH+2pQro/mVkFMbXPBcIWpSGwrq6OZJT5RHIGp2RQdgXpOloNvgnLsH4JqHBZfIndD00A2CXtVnbJnKeos8hGVhrEcoR55Gx2vWnWI7hwpWrCBQDZLWCf67tg7Ygoj/6lef3OL073gA=; X-YMail-OSG: Y.CAz1UVM1lBjO96q0EotwtUPFuLTJVdnqtGXIjFvy.mP9S X5qsaSfEP.uZInMr.PMYKko6Zk6GUYM.ndfTxrME1gF0VIU.y0rdWO9Bivm0 OPf9.pO4rkWF2IgxcjljSTV1XuAU9r2PGLa9KTSI6FMfbHlw2NpLNkFEkAmU oRis2pCgU9RQ1yDZSdAHt7LkHDHh24BBPtqvxK.nPBhYScm5vSIzYSPAewud jNDt0xhO0Pcd3NzKFKV4xZv3VaBV_RvYXofhXqc4Z0Zt2pBfKiuRp_9APzos B4_iP6vPweAf2__wA.by9OaHMUW2DoV2tCjPlzpLivHh3xu2B5rCYYeFaiWf YbLdq82ZEQUpnywB_LGxoO6fBU28KXAL22NdomspxAsvJzcv2SBdVuP33u3H qR6koZBVIoBQ91q3fFPjrolK1VKrmqsQ2ZD0DdvqjzTTvELA9Ue_gISpu.Sj 7Q2DW2ys2kS5hwDp7YXvwztG0WC8fd5roGUee_H1mTGViXyT3eXAe4uzCmfv 5OmMhW0fnb25UbhsIyoK3CSQ54orycBbS860NH16jdr1eXxCg_4Gu7XJiqwe tzlZLJg-- Received: from [66.92.43.99] by web164002.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 04:06:18 PST X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001, DQoNCi0tLSBPbiBTYXQsIDIvMjMvMTMsIEtvb3AgTWFzdCA8a3dtQHJhaW5ib3ctcnVubmVyLm5sPiB3cm90ZToNCg0KRnJvbTogS29vcCBNYXN0IDxrd21AcmFpbmJvdy1ydW5uZXIubmw.DQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogU3RhdHVzIG9mIG1hdGgvZ251bWVyaWMgdW5hYmxlIHRvIGtlZXAgdXAgd2l0aCB1cHN0cmVhbSByZWxlYXNlcz8NClRvOiAiVGhvbWFzIE11ZWxsZXIiIDxtdWVsbGVyNjcyNEBiZWxsc291dGgubmV0Pg0KQ2M6IGdub21lQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnLCBmcmVlYnNkLXBvcnRzQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnDQoBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/15.1.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.134.513 Message-ID: <1361621178.58726.YahooMailClassic@web164002.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 04:06:18 -0800 (PST) From: Jeffrey Bouquet Subject: Was: Status of math/gnumeric [req] coincide with another (png) maybe... To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <51288E35.1070301@rainbow-runner.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 12:09:38 -0000 --- On Sat, 2/23/13, Koop Mast wrote: From: Koop Mast Subject: Re: Status of math/gnumeric unable to keep up with upstream releas= es? To: "Thomas Mueller" Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Saturday, February 23, 2013, 1:39 AM On 22-2-2013 21:35, Thomas Mueller wrote: > What is the status of gnumeric being stuck at 1.10.17 when upstream has r= eleased 1.12.0 ? > > I think gnumeric >=3D 1.11.x has gtk+ >=3D 3.0.0 as a dependency?=A0 I ch= ecked gnumeric web site www.gnumeric.org . > > I see this is the same snag that prevents transmission > 2.5 from buildin= g, though possibly one could do > > portmaster -o transmission-cli transmission ? > > So what is the status now of gtk+ 3.x ? > > > Tom >I'm working on a update for glib20 and gtk+2 and gtk+3. gnumeric is on=20 the list of ports to update afterwards. What I know of transmission is=20 that only transmission-gtk is currently broken because it wants a newer=20 >>gtk+3 version then we got in ports. >>-Koop _______________________________________________ ... Could both glib20/gtk20 *and* png be delayed until both are ready, so perso= ns could upgrade ports depending upon both simultaneously?=A0 (If the latter i= s a shared library bump anyway...) J. Bouquet