From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 06:52:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10ABA16A4CE; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 06:52:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from shaft.techsupport.co.uk (shaft.techsupport.co.uk [212.250.77.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1454043D9D; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 06:51:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from cpc2-cdif3-6-0-cust204.cdif.cable.ntl.com ([81.103.67.204] helo=shrike.submonkey.net ident=mailnull) by shaft.techsupport.co.uk with esmtp (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1AixEG-0002yY-Uy; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:51:45 +0000 Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1AixEF-000J8N-1t; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:51:43 +0000 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:51:43 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: "Simon L. Nielsen" Message-ID: <20040120145142.GO47004@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , "Simon L. Nielsen" , Lukas Ertl , Marc Fonvieille , freebsd-doc@freebsd.org References: <200401201340.i0KDePlc030253@freefall.freebsd.org> <20040120144344.G90355@pcle2.cc.univie.ac.at> <20040120141101.GJ47004@submonkey.net> <20040120144627.GH686@arthur.nitro.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040120144627.GH686@arthur.nitro.dk> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Ceri Davies cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/61625: Wrong maximal UID and GID in Handbook, section 8.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:52:10 -0000 On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 03:46:29PM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > How about the attached patch? This is an introduction section/chapter, > so I don't think there should be too many details, since it's not > relevant to most people anyway. Looks OK to me, with s/GID's/GIDs/. Thanks for working on this. Ceri --