From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 5 05:19:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7EF16A420 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 05:19:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: from relay00.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.5.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C1B043D5E for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 05:19:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 95959 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2005 05:19:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 5 Dec 2005 05:19:30 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 23:19:23 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack To: Bruce Evans In-Reply-To: <20051129184901.I34802@delplex.bde.org> Message-ID: <20051204231731.N43418@odysseus.silby.com> References: <200511280832.jAS8WGvs059057@repoman.freebsd.org> <438AD8FB.A8B96AB6@freebsd.org> <20051128172718.GA59929@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20051129110058.T33820@delplex.bde.org> <20051129012102.GA84108@nagual.pp.ru> <20051129184901.I34802@delplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann , cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Bruce Evans , Steve Kargl , Andrey Chernov Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/msun/src e_lgammaf_r.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 05:19:33 -0000 On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Andrey Chernov wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 11:49:13AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: >>> I don't like writing papers, and rarely read them these days. >> >> Not writting the paper about your libm changes will increase chances your >> changes will be simple lost at some step. Possible scenario: 1) One of > > They won't be lost, becaue they are in cvs :-). Would it be possible to write regression tests which verify that accuracy is not lost due to future changes to libm? That would be the best way to ensure that your work is not lost in the future. Mike "Silby" Silbersack