From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 21 19:03:33 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A2816A41A for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:03:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59B3A13C48A for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:03:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 9056 invoked by uid 399); 21 Sep 2007 19:03:32 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO slave.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 21 Sep 2007 19:03:32 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:03:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Rui Paulo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <200709132302.l8DN2Tv5076033@repoman.freebsd.org> <46E9FC0C.70607@FreeBSD.org> <46F1A96F.2040602@FreeBSD.org> X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0xD5B2F0FB Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: GSoC2007: cnst-sensors.2007-09-13.patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:03:33 -0000 On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Rui Paulo wrote: > > On 21 Sep 2007, at 00:12, Doug Barton wrote: > >> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: >> >>> Thanks for testing! >> >> Glad to help. In case it's interesting, I was doing the xorg update with >> portmaster last night and I got several "PROCHOT asserted" messages on my >> console at different times. I'm assuming that's expected behavior, just >> curious if it's something bad, as in when that happens it's time to turn >> off the laptop? (I didn't seem them when the happened, they were there when >> I got back to check on the compiling.) > > That basically means the digital sensor has detected a high temperature and > it allows the operating system to do "something". I plan to work a bit more > on coretemp(4) so that all these notifications go through devctl(4). Great, I look forward to that. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection