From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Mar  9 02:14:18 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id CAA08044
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 9 Mar 1996 02:14:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA08039
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 1996 02:14:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.4/8.6.9) with SMTP id CAA01464; Sat, 9 Mar 1996 02:13:58 -0800 (PST)
To: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org, Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
Subject: Re: seg fault and strlen 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 09 Mar 1996 01:41:26 PST."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.960309013951.7129A-100000@nike.efn.org> 
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 1996 02:13:57 -0800
Message-ID: <1462.826366437@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> I'm not sure this is the best place to put it... but is it ok for strlen 
> to seg fault your program when you pass a null pointer to it?  just 

Yes, it is.

					Jordan