From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 12 17:00:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8353516A4CE for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:00:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman.arcor.de (newsread1.arcor-online.net [151.189.0.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6DE43D39 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:00:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-51-138.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.51.138]) (authenticated bits=0)i2D10Tck021832 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 13 Mar 2004 02:00:30 +0100 (MET) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1B1xVq-000AC0-Sm; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 02:00:26 +0100 Message-ID: <40525D2A.4000508@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 02:00:26 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergey Matveychuk References: <40525AA4.5090104@ciam.ru> In-Reply-To: <40525AA4.5090104@ciam.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INDEX vs. INDEX-5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 01:00:37 -0000 Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > May be the question is silly but why we have both INDEX and INDEX-5? > > I've found no ways to place 5.x-only port into INDEX-5. > > What is difference to build INDEX on 4.x machine and INDEX-5 on 5.x? The > ports tree is the same anyway. Try cd astro/setiathome env OSVERSION=490000 make describe env OSVERSION=502100 make describe see the difference?