From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug  6 21:37:12 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222FB37B404
	for <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Aug 2003 21:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E87443FBD
	for <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Aug 2003 21:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 74725 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Aug 2003 04:37:13 -0000
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 21:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Scott <scottl@pooker.samsco.home>
In-Reply-To: <20030806123207.F4081@pooker.samsco.home>
Message-ID: <20030806213643.F74720@root.org>
References: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C853370274216B@mail.sandvine.com>
 <1695190000.1060183917@aslan.scsiguy.com> <20030806093347.N73637@root.org>
 <20030806123207.F4081@pooker.samsco.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: "'freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>
cc: "'aic7xxx@freebsd.org'" <aic7xxx@freebsd.org>
Subject: RE: Ongoing U320 AIC7902 Seagate ST318453LW issues, SCB timed out
X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: SCSI subsystem <freebsd-scsi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 04:37:12 -0000

On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Scott wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> > > > I offer this patch to make a loader tunable out of the maximum
> > > > tags supported.
> > >
> > > It should be a cam tunable.
> >
> > Terse.  I think he means it should be "kern.cam.ahd%d.max_tags"
>
> I'll go out on a limb and suggest 'kern.cam.da%d.max_tags" or something
> similar, as this will be useful for more than just the Adaptec chip.

Max tags is a property of cam (i.e. cam_sim_alloc()) and thus not a scsi
(da(4)) issue.

-Nate