From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 28 23:10:23 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB201065670;
	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:10:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from arundel@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE948FC0C;
	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:10:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9SNAN0H024657;
	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:10:23 GMT
	(envelope-from arundel@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from arundel@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o9SNAN0N024623;
	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:10:23 GMT (envelope-from arundel)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:10:23 GMT
Message-Id: <201010282310.o9SNAN0N024623@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: rui@ruilopes.com, arundel@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
From: arundel@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: bin/57088: [cam] [patch] for a possible fd leak in libcam.c
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:10:23 -0000

Synopsis: [cam] [patch] for a possible fd leak in libcam.c

State-Changed-From-To: suspended->open
State-Changed-By: arundel
State-Changed-When: Thu Oct 28 22:27:36 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why: 
The fd leak was fixed in r158171. The possible buffer overruns however still
exist.
I'll submit a patch shortly (against HEAD), which will turn all sprintf(3) calls
in connection with cam_errbuf to snprintf(3) calls. Although this might not be
necessary in all cases, it should however improve overall robustness of
camlib.c.


Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-fs
Responsible-Changed-By: arundel
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Oct 28 22:27:36 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Over to maintainer(s).

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=57088