From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 29 21:25:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475721065679 for ; Thu, 29 May 2008 21:25:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from raq5.nitrex.net (raq5.nitrex.net [213.165.227.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00558FC13 for ; Thu, 29 May 2008 21:25:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from [192.168.10.141] (gate.zenatode.org.uk [213.165.225.167]) by raq5.nitrex.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m4TLPmRl020114 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 May 2008 22:25:54 +0100 Message-ID: <483F1F5C.5060101@onetel.com> Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 22:25:48 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080528) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Buff References: <26face530805241258y199474edkcef7f79f8569b216@mail.gmail.com> <4838981D.4010906@onetel.com> <483DE440.8040308@onetel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unix command-line tools to edit SharePoint site? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 21:25:57 -0000 Kurt Buff wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Chris Whitehouse wrote: >> Kurt Buff wrote: >>> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Chris Whitehouse >>> wrote: >>>> http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ >>>> >>>> Chris >>> If you want to use some/many/most of the core utils on Windows, you'll >>> be much better off with http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net >>> >>> unxutils seems pretty moribund, and I have not been successful >>> downloading the updates from that site for a while. >>> >>> Kurt >> I'll have a look at these, thanks for the suggestion. I have to say though >> the unxutils commands that I have used work perfectly well despite their >> age, don't require cygwin and don't do silly registry things on windows. I >> need this as I'm using them on a work computer which I am not allowed to >> install software on :P >> >> Chris > > The unxutils work well, but the gnuwin32 stuff is a bit more current, > and more complete. They don't require any registry fiddling nor extra > DLLs, either, just like the unxutils stuff. I stick them in a > directory, and set my path up with that. Works well for me, anyway. > > > HTH, > > Kurt Cool! I will definitely check these out, thanks. (Sorry list, OT) Chris