From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May  2 15:22:05 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: perl@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12733391
 for <perl@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  2 May 2015 15:22:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from apnoea.adamw.org (apnoea.adamw.org [204.109.59.150])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "abg.ninja", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A87DC13D1
 for <perl@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  2 May 2015 15:22:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by apnoea.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6ba4022a;
 TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO;
 for <perl@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 2 May 2015 09:21:57 -0600 (MDT)
From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Unmaintained perl ports
Message-Id: <EA129229-7012-4367-A026-9908981E01CA@adamw.org>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 09:21:54 -0600
To: perl@FreeBSD.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports
 <freebsd-perl.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-perl>,
 <mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-perl/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-perl@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl>,
 <mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 15:22:05 -0000

Hi everyone,

What's our perspective on perl ports maintained by perl@? For the most =
part, those ports don't get updated or improved very often. I tend only =
to scan portscout for perl@ ports.

I was thinking about assigning those modules to perl@. What do you think =
of that idea?

# Adam


--=20
Adam Weinberger
adamw@adamw.org
http://www.adamw.org