From owner-freebsd-security Wed Jun 26 19: 2:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4849D37E3E0 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:49:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 0E4255362; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 03:49:47 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: hawkeyd@visi.com Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NUTS! "Much ado about nothing" -- I need a clearer up or down References: <200206261711.g5QHB9t00396@sheol.localdomain> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 27 Jun 2002 03:49:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200206261711.g5QHB9t00396@sheol.localdomain> Message-ID: Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org hawkeyd@visi.com (D J Hawkey Jr) writes: > Sorry to be so thick-headed, but between Mike and Jacques, the answer > to "Is 'OpenSSH_2.9 FreeBSD localisations 20020307' even vulnerable?" > is "That does appear to be the case.". 2.9 is not vulnerable to this particular attack. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message