From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 13 15:57:07 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1891065672;
	Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:57:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-yx0-f184.google.com (mail-yx0-f184.google.com
	[209.85.210.184])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B278FC22;
	Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:57:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yxe14 with SMTP id 14so21285990yxe.7
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
	:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=BOCDw0YPyUacEfOROerZ3aElAsd9M4L760LaLHLrhGA=;
	b=c3ZakIC8uZz2HPbeJsD9kXd2qP0XDs8eSvKH29nZH8RBIJfefGwuDc/3Y+eC1vEq4R
	mGValAvqGBic844mY/ZRNnuUattdORMf7WJ/qm4jitXMjQ2oQE7GWo7CfvyMhrzaDr3p
	+NXU0EQFQjvB1V/v2ZrlytYM0GcifqBXEldHw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	b=cuOUG0pYvYTLbDaYmzgndWW6IEAckg7zJxkfNev0J6upzd9RCOxRvVMMrUMLom5Xzt
	L2SlxD6KddG1tUoeNg9FFewRy+2PBpwV1CGSP3XOqi8XG4hzuGX2O6cY4F/70sfmdaGk
	mu7k7BVRCKhX9pFdqK7/9GWMadX+oNvNIkp0Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.130.38 with SMTP id c38mr12776141ybd.213.1255447934616; 
	Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20091013035504.GA72620@svzserv.kemerovo.su>
References: <20091011175428.GA3626@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<20091013035504.GA72620@svzserv.kemerovo.su>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:32:14 -0700
Message-ID: <b269bc570910130832g7c902eedxd34027e1fca1c54a@mail.gmail.com>
From: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
To: stable@freebsd.org, fs@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: 
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Status Reports April - September, 2009
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:57:07 -0000

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 05:54:29PM +0000, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
>  > FreeBSD/ZFS
> >
> >    Contact: Pawel Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
> >
> >    We believe that the ZFS file system is now production-ready in FreeBSD
> >    8.0. Most (if not all) reported bugs were fixed and ZFS is no longer
> >    tagged as experimental. There is also ongoing work in Perforce to
> bring
> >    the latest ZFS version (v19) to FreeBSD.
>
> That's great news. However, my experience says me not place dot-zero
> relese under business-critical tasks and load.
>
> What about status of ZFS in 7.2? Does 7.2 contain the same ZFS code?
>
> 7.2-RELEASE includes ZFSv6.

7-STABLE (after the release of 7.2) includes ZFSv13.

8.0-RELEASE will include ZFSv13.

IOW, 8.0 and 7.3 will have roughly the same ZFS code, although I believe the
plan is to leave it marked as "experimental" in 7.x and only remove that
warning in 8.x.



-- 
Freddie Cash
fjwcash@gmail.com