Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Apr 1999 12:11:07 +0300
From:      "Max Kool" <koolmax@hotmail.com>
To:        "Marty Poulin" <mpoulin@honk.org>
Cc:        <freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Dillema...
Message-ID:  <20000411025617.81746.qmail@hotmail.com>
References:  <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000327132954.7295C-100000@spectre>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello again all,

Thanks for all your advice. I finally got the time to fool around
with them operating systems.

Some of you asked for a follow-up on this so here it is.

After realizing I have no partitioning program, I downloaded Partition
Magic 5 which took about 4 days (I don't have much time to spend
on my computer and I'm only a 33K). I decided to just make one
partition (1.2 GB) and install all of them one by one and keep the
one I like most. I first installed RedHat 6.1, as I heard it had a
user-friendly installer with no problems. It's not the installer I had
trouble with. Firstly, it wouldn't multi-boot even though I told him
to when I installed it. Or is there a key I should have pressed when
it went "LILO boot..."? Anyway, I got over that and then spent an
hour and a half trying to get GNOME to use 800x600x16bpp.
I ran xconf a couple hundred times (well.. :-)) but it would either use
the normal 640x480x8bpp or it just wouldn't start telling me that
no video modes are usable. I said what the hell and next
I tried FreeBSD. While I hear the installation should have been painless,
I couldn't install it. Maybe because it's an older version (3.2, june '99),
I dunno - what I had trouble with was Fdisk. I don't know what I did wrong.
I marked my partition FreeBSD, all was ok, it said it didn't need a swap
partition, I didn't give it one. And when I wanted to start the actual
install, it told me that it needed several more partitions (guess I should
have taken notes cause I can't remember what those were). So call me
stupid, but I couldn't install FreeBSD. Ah well, I'll try again and
eventually
succeed. Guess it is user friendly but that depends on the user :-)
Next up, Corel Linux Deluxe. Installation was child's play and I've only
two problems with it: it didn't detect my soundcard and I couldn't dial
into my ISP (I dunno how to disable 'logging on to network').

> 1.  FreeBSD
>     The installation should be painless - make sure to check your hardware
> against the hardware compatibility list, particularly if you have an
> ethernet card.

Which reminds me - there were 13 conflicting devices. I removed them all
instead of the Sony CD-ROM as I had none of the others. Shouldn't I have?

> 2.  Red Hat Linux
>     6.1 is a pretty good version to install - it has a "windows-like" gui
> installer.  Their disk partition utility was ok - it will be a big help if
> you plan on multi-booting your system,

It wasn't (see above).

> but I still prefer the FreeBSD boot
> manager over LILO.

I agree, I didn't even get to install FreeBSD and it had already set up the
multi-
boot.

> 3.  Corel Open Linux
>     Yikes. <snip> In my opinion Corel is still Alpha-quality, but like I
said
> lots of people seem to like it.

Hey you UNIX gurus don't need Corel Linux. It's for us newbies that
can't get RedHat or FreeBSD to run :-)

> If you're going to try it, watch out for the ATI Rage 3d
> card problem.

I have a Voodoo Banshee with 16MB and it worked with no fuss from the
beggining
in 1024x768x16bpp (which is more than I hoped, as I can't even get winblowz
to use that resolution - can't adjust the refresh rate). Guess I was just
lucky :-)


Well, thanks again for your advice, guys. I'll keep you posted.



Max


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-newbies" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000411025617.81746.qmail>