Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 11:27:54 +0200 From: Michael Landin Hostbaek <mich@FreeBSD.org> To: Cheng-Lung Sung <clsung@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, kde@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/libtunepimp Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/audio/libtunepimp/files patch-configure Message-ID: <20060728092754.GB54145@mich2.itxmarket.com> In-Reply-To: <20060728025304.GA92930@FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw> References: <200607231405.k6NE5ewh013386@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060727091217.GN82058@mich2.itxmarket.com> <20060727093200.GA14150@FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw> <20060727093938.GV82058@mich2.itxmarket.com> <20060728025304.GA92930@FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cheng-Lung Sung (clsung) writes: > Will they (juk/amarok) have updates in few days? I doubt it. The 0.3 to 0.4 took a looooong time to be supported.. > Or just set them BROKEN for a while? I don't think it is a good solution. If I remember correctly only a few ports uses the tunepimp lib, it would be silly to mark them as BROKEN, just to have 0.5 in the tree.. Alternatively I could rip out musicbrainz support of amarok.. I don't know what the juk maintainer is planning to do.. (kde@ cc'ed) /mich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060728092754.GB54145>