From owner-freebsd-java Thu Jun 8 5: 2:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hermes.research.kpn.com (hermes.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED83637BF60 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 05:02:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from K.J.Koster@kpn.com) Received: from l04.research.kpn.com (l04.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.204]) by research.kpn.com (PMDF V5.2-31 #42699) with ESMTP id <01JQD2N9F2JU00019I@research.kpn.com> for freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 14:02:18 +0200 Received: by l04.research.kpn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 08 Jun 2000 14:02:17 +0100 Content-return: allowed Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 14:02:15 +0100 From: "Koster, K.J." Subject: RE: To: 'John Daniels' , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D762E@l04.research.kpn.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > The BSDi press release is (purposely?) vague. It doesn't > seem like the kind of news they want to shout about. > Hmm. Dunno. It seems like to me like shoutable news. > > BTW, how far from alpha is "controlled beta"? > Well, I don't know how far BSDi has advanced, but *our* port is alpha quality until Greg says otherwise. Maybe BSDi has a different port altogether? :-) Kees Jan ============================================== Everyone is responsible for his own actions, and (people tend to forget this) the effect they have on others. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message