Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 20:22:00 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Hans_Petter_Selasky?= <hans.petter.selasky@bitfrost.no> To: =?utf-8?Q?Adrian_Chadd?= <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: =?utf-8?Q?freebsd-acpi=40freebsd=2Eorg?= <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>, =?utf-8?Q?freebsd-stable=40freebsd=2Eorg?= <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, =?utf-8?Q?Ian_Smith?= <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>, =?utf-8?Q?freebsd-usb=40?= =?utf-8?Q?freebsd=2Eorg?= <freebsd-usb@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume Message-ID: <zarafa.51d9b1c8.50e2.45a240e13f4f2420@mail.lockless.no> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmokE_=YjewFdLp2NvdMKmPvcxG7P-noLUvL3T_2X7wgfLQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-Vmomg2j-nJi%2BqFr3CpCjHKjHEiLE=xyNyx1VGRL5U-r8gzQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, The USB code should re-attach the uhub driver to the root HUB and any other HUBs after resume. Part of the attach code is to set the power on. See /sys/dev/usb/usb_hub.c And: grep -r UHF_PORT_POWER /sys/dev/usb/ --HPS -----Original message----- > From:Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org <mailto:adrian@freebsd.org> > > Sent: Sunday 7th July 2013 18:43 > To: Hans Petter Selasky <hans.petter.selasky@bitfrost.no <mailto:hans.petter.selasky@bitfrost.no> > > Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org> ; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> ; Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au <mailto:smithi@nimnet.asn.au> >; freebsd-usb@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-usb@freebsd.org> > Subject: Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume > > I don't think it's a USB controller issue. > > Those ports are connected to USB hubs, right? I wonder if there's some > ACPI nonsense that's resulting in the hubs not being powered up on > resume. > > > > -adrian > > On 7 July 2013 00:32, Hans Petter Selasky > <hans.petter.selasky@bitfrost.no <mailto:hans.petter.selasky@bitfrost.no> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > FYI: The USB stack will currently run a complete controller reset upon > > resume, like during boot. > > > > --HPS > > > > > > > > -----Original message----- > >> From:Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au <mailto:smithi@nimnet.asn.au> > > >> Sent: Sunday 7th July 2013 7:52 > >> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org <mailto:adrian@freebsd.org> > > >> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org> ; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> ; > >> freebsd-usb@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-usb@freebsd.org> > >> Subject: Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume > >> > >> On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 15:02:57 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> > On 30 June 2013 07:22, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au <mailto:smithi@nimnet.asn.au> > wrote: > >> [..] > >> > > Nothing of note that I can see, if that usb hub-to-bus remapping is > >> > > normal. As you said, 'CPU0: local APIC error 0x40' looks maybe sus. > >> > > Maybe someone who knows might comment on that? > >> > >> Does noone know what that signifies? Maybe it's not relevant to this. > >> > >> > > Just checking: you've tried other USB devices apart from uftdi0? > >> > > >> > Yup, there's no 5v on the port. > >> > >> I was rather taken aback to hear this. Would not this indicate a > >> failure to reinitialise the basic underlying USB hardware on resume? > >> > >> More than a bit bemused, Ian > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org> mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>; > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org> " > >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org> mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>; > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org> " > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 7 18:24:13 2013 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9710A48C; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:24:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alfred@ixsystems.com) Received: from mail.iXsystems.com (newknight.ixsystems.com [206.40.55.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3FC1EE4; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (mail.ixsystems.com [10.2.55.1]) by mail.iXsystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9908B63FBE; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 11:24:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.iXsystems.com ([10.2.55.1]) by localhost (mail.ixsystems.com [10.2.55.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95737-01; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 11:24:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Alfreds-MacBook-Pro-9.local (c-67-180-208-218.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.208.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.iXsystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2959863FB3; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 11:24:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ixsystems.com; s=newknight0; t73221452; bh=SPrfY7P35f7UghJ1gVa5kkivVUt+obULHh093QA5EbE=; hÚte:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ne8p/mqKRpoz+jDwoG+/I+BmdcWlV47/lQ5E64fAUoXIP8DbtKWmywpdxrD7DWiab YTC9/L0IXcCVBezUrjgBg5DkHkx5cNFLc0lrK9DF0jdiu2zLrX49UiAYQ+nCV3Fvaj 1ejUU5VYThP0T0crxy90oWNxVAjzRBZiQDici/HUMessage-ID: <51D9B24B.8070303@ixsystems.com> Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 11:24:11 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@ixsystems.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2 References: <51D90B9B.9080209@ixsystems.com> <51D92826.1070707@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <51D92826.1070707@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>, <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 18:24:13 -0000 On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote: > On 07.07.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> Andre, >> >> Are you going to have time to MFC things from -current for >> auto-tuning -stable before 9.2? > > I simply ran out of time on Friday and MFCing such a big change requires > more testing. > >> I fear (maybe unnecessarily?) that we are about to ship yet another >> release that can't do basic >> 10gigE when sufficient memory exists. > > There was some debate with myself whether such a behavior changing MFC > would be appropriate for a mid-stream stable release. I guess yes, > though > a number of people who currently set the parameters manually would have > to remove their tuning settings. > >> If you don't have time, then let me know and I'll see what I can do. > > Can you help me with with testing? > Yes. Please give me your proposed changes and I'll stand up a machine and give feedback. -Alfred
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?zarafa.51d9b1c8.50e2.45a240e13f4f2420>