From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 30 09:02:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E861437B401 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 09:02:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from above.proper.com (mail.proper.com [208.184.76.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6071643F3F for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 09:02:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Received: from [63.202.92.152] (adsl-63-202-92-152.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.92.152]) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2UH2YJN004869; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 09:02:34 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: phoffprop@mail.proper.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20030330162923.GL82863@sub21-156.member.dsl-only.net> References: <20030330162923.GL82863@sub21-156.member.dsl-only.net> X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 08:44:34 -0800 To: nkinkade@fastmail.fm From: Paul Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Best X configurator for laptops? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 17:02:42 -0000 At 8:29 AM -0800 3/30/03, Nathan Kinkade wrote: >On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 07:59:59AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> Hi again. I have a Dell Inspiron 3500 laptop, now running 4.7. >> xf86cfg and xf86config both give (different) unusable results for my >> system. Which of the other X configurators in the ports collection >> seem to do a good job on laptops, if any? >> >> --Paul Hoffman > >You need to be more specific about the problems you are encountering. I was trying to avoid that because it doesn't seem like this is a good place to debug particular XWindows problems. But, since you asked, the screen comes up blank. There are no XWindows errors, just a blank screen. Thus, my quest for a better configuration...