From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 8 23:46:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCF6106564A; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 23:46:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2608FC08; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 23:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (71.246.240.70) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.234.1; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 16:46:09 -0700 Message-ID: <4C0ED63C.4050002@p6m7g8.com> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 19:46:04 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Sedov References: <4C0D6B9E.3080308@p6m7g8.com> <20100607160309.2b35c464.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20100607160309.2b35c464.stas@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigEFF0A31AF3DD31ABC7050977" Cc: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: duplicate ruby- and rubygem- ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:46:09 -0000 --------------enigEFF0A31AF3DD31ABC7050977 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 6/7/2010 7:03 PM, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 21:58:54 +0000 > "Philip M. Gollucci" mentioned: >=20 >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> $ ip dir ruby |sed -e 's,ruby-,,' -e 's,rubygem-,,' \ >> |sort |uniq -c |sort -n |grep -v 1 >> 2 audio/mp3info >> >=20 > This one is the old problem, afaik you dropped the duplicate 'gem' > version some time ago. I don't know whou added rubygem version again. >=20 > Anyway, thanks for looking into this. >=20 I still tend to prefer the gems version better. Yes you can't patch the code but the updates are much easier and require less porting. --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. --------------enigEFF0A31AF3DD31ABC7050977 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAkwO1j0ACgkQdbiP+9ubjBzwXwCfRQQTqbNOcjouvRhCsfZEzrpB VN4An3yKJ3Al0b6hVLFBaUGqBoBgPFCZ =F1zw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigEFF0A31AF3DD31ABC7050977--