From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 11 13:46:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (rdu57-28-046.nc.rr.com [66.57.28.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A79B37B405 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:46:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (marcus@localhost) by shumai.marcuscom.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0BLkYw81712; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:46:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shumai.marcuscom.com: marcus owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:46:34 -0500 (EST) From: Joe Clarke To: Steven Farmer Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should /sbin/mount_smbfs be static? In-Reply-To: <15423.22138.622826.566389@catbert.megahack.com> Message-ID: <20020111164558.P80091-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Steven Farmer wrote: > Is it ok for /sbin/mount_smbfs to be dynamically linked? Just > wondering, since I noticed that it's the only thing /sbin that is: IMHO, it should be statically linked, even though if all hell breaks loose, the chance you'll be using mount_smbfs to fix the system are slim. Joe > > [catbert] ~> uname -a > FreeBSD catbert.megahack.com 4.5-RC FreeBSD 4.5-RC #0: Fri Jan 11 12:32:22 CST 2002 steve@catbert.megahack.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CATBERT i386 > [catbert] ~> file /sbin/mount_smbfs > /sbin/mount_smbfs: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped > [catbert] ~> ldd /sbin/mount_smbfs > /sbin/mount_smbfs: > libsmb.so.1 => /usr/lib/libsmb.so.1 (0x28066000) > libc.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc.so.4 (0x28071000) > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message