From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Sep 28 07:05:11 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA08707 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 28 Sep 1996 07:05:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (root@buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA08667 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 1996 07:05:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from buffnet1.buffnet.net (mmdf@buffnet1.buffnet.net [205.246.19.10]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id FAA21941; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 05:38:07 GMT Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net by buffnet1.buffnet.net id aa04424; 25 Sep 96 6:43 EDT Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 06:43:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Steve To: bogusz@lib.amu.edu.pl cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk If they've inserted supported equipment new to anything about version 2.0 in the FAQ Im both surprised and pleased. The reason I didnt look, is because historically it was outdated. On Wed, 25 Sep 1996 bogusz@lib.amu.edu.pl wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Sep 1996, Steve wrote: > > > > > > > Are there any 100mBit ethernet cards supported under 2.1R? 2.1.5R? > > > > Also, does anyone know if mmap is fixed in 2.1.5R? > > > If you look at the FAQ pages you will notice, that all cards with > the DEC 21140 chip are supported (eg. SVEC FastEthernet cards) > But the 3C595TX and Intel EtherPower are also said to work fine > (browse please the today's messages from freebsd-questions, there > is something about it). > > Bogusz >