From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 27 15:16:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AD668F; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:16:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@bitfrost.no) Received: from mta.bitpro.no (mta.bitpro.no [92.42.64.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74D8921; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.bitfrost.no (mail.bitfrost.no [46.29.221.36]) by mta.bitpro.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCC87A11C; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:16:28 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at bitfrost.no Received: from smtp.bitfrost.no (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hanspetter) by mail.bitfrost.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7132220764; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:16:23 +0100 (CET) From: Hans Petter Selasky Organization: Bitfrost A/S To: Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: ACPI locking bugs? Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:17:38 +0100 References: <201302271453.43985.hps@bitfrost.no> <512E1E3D.7090501@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <512E1E3D.7090501@FreeBSD.org> X-Face: ?p&W)c(+80hU; '{.$5K+zq{oC6y| /D'an*6mw>j'f:eBsex\Gi, Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:16:31 -0000 On Wednesday 27 February 2013 15:54:53 Andriy Gapon wrote: > kib drew my attention to this issue some time ago and I also pinged jkim > about it. I completely agree with you that the signal handling should be > removed. Are you willing to make the change or would you prefer me doing > it? > > Thank you. Hi, Please make the change and don't forget to MFC. --HPS