From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 15 23:22:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FC716A418 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:22:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88FB313C461 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:22:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58E3207E; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:22:04 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: -0.3/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11702049; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:22:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8CAB984492; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:22:04 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Eygene Ryabinkin References: Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:22:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Eygene Ryabinkin's message of "Wed\, 13 Feb 2008 11\:57\:11 +0300") Message-ID: <86r6fdx0tf.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Ian FREISLICH , Ken Smith , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RC2 Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:22:11 -0000 Eygene Ryabinkin writes: > Judging by the > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-current/2007-February/06= 9051.html > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-current/2007-February/06= 9059.html > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-current/2007-February/06= 9077.html > people are varying in their opinions ;)) So your mileage may vary. > Seems like the old 2:1 rule is not very cost-effective for common > setups, but, again, it depends on the situation. Not cost-effective? What is the "street price" of 16 GB disk space these days? About the same as a couple of Big Macs? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no