From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Oct 28 16:15:05 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA09351 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 16:15:05 -0700 Received: from blob.best.net (blob.best.net [204.156.128.88]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA09344 for ; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 16:15:03 -0700 Received: from geli.clusternet (rcarter.vip.best.com [204.156.137.2]) by blob.best.net (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id QAA16633; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 16:14:49 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by geli.clusternet (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA17833; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 16:12:20 -0700 Message-Id: <199510282312.QAA17833@geli.clusternet> X-Authentication-Warning: geli.clusternet: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.4 10/10/95 To: Terry Lambert cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty Jr.), rcarter@geli.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Arcanity in services on servers In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 28 Oct 1995 15:43:15 PDT." <199510282243.PAA02954@phaeton.artisoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 28 Oct 1995 16:12:19 -0700 From: "Russell L. Carter" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [ Lot's of interesting services on servers stuff deleted ] > The services I'm talking about are things like "the next 1024 frames > of 'Batman Returns'" or "the latest release of pkzip". Or the object pointed to by a URL, or the next "newsgroup"... > > > This discussion is probably getting too arcane for the general > list readership; we should probably move it to private email. Now, isn't this the sort of thing that should be on hackers? Where else can we get multiplatform design discussions that we can use to help figure out where we (and FreeBSD:) should go next? It gets arcane when the discussion gets down to details, which of course is where the truth is... Cheers, Russell > > > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. >