Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 14:59:57 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BDB corrupt Message-ID: <20080513125956.GD397@britannica.bec.de> In-Reply-To: <2117635718.20080513154406@mail.ru> References: <op.uavxx8ip2n4ijf@duckjen.nextgentel.no> <9FC19AC2-DAD8-418C-8B9C-F129DEC58CEF@gmail.com> <15336578.20080512123806@mail.ru> <200805121153.00809.jonathan%2Bfreebsd-hackers@hst.org.za> <1663320218.20080512223531@mail.ru> <20080512152430.3720683e@mbook.local> <2117635718.20080513154406@mail.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 03:44:06PM +0400, Anthony Pankov wrote: > 3. reading/writing = 60%/40% I don't know where you get those numbers from, but they feel *very* wrong from the perspective of someone who actually dealt a lot with those tools. Writing is only a very small part of the operations and typically done a single large batch. For the same reason a single reader/writer lock is perfective fine. Joerg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080513125956.GD397>