From owner-cvs-ports  Wed Oct  8 01:16:36 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA02353
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 01:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-ports)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca9-32.ix.netcom.com [207.93.143.96])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA02220;
          Wed, 8 Oct 1997 01:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.7/8.6.9) id BAA06461; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 01:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 01:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199710080815.BAA06461@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: max@wide.ad.jp
CC: winter@jurai.net, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org,
        cvs-ports@freebsd.org, max@wide.ad.jp
In-reply-to: <199710060626.PAA03946@access.sfc.wide.ad.jp> (message from Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= on Mon, 06 Oct 1997 15:26:08 +0900)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/misc/qpage - Imported sources
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * As I read this, I came to think that it might be more appropriate to
 * have qpage in comms category.  What does everyone thing about this?

I agree with you.

Satoshi