From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 30 10:20:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535C5106564A for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430A08FC18 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:20:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2UAK4ki091624 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:20:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o2UAK4fB091600; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:20:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:20:04 GMT Message-Id: <201003301020.o2UAK4fB091600@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Fedor Dikarev Cc: Subject: Re: bin/145194: Changed output of sockstat for AF_INET6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Fedor Dikarev List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:20:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/145194; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Fedor Dikarev To: Maxim Konovalov Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/145194: Changed output of sockstat for AF_INET6 Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:38:51 +0400 30.03.2010 13:33, Maxim Konovalov пишет: > This one looks more correct, doesn't it? > > Index: sockstat.c > =================================================================== > --- sockstat.c (revision 205577) > +++ sockstat.c (working copy) > @@ -621,6 +621,8 @@ > case AF_INET: > case AF_INET6: > pos += printaddr(s->family, &s->laddr); > + if ((AF_INET6 == s->family) && (pos >= 58)) > + pos += xprintf(" "); > while (pos < 58) > pos += xprintf(" "); > pos += printaddr(s->family, &s->faddr); > > %%% > Yes, it'll be better -- I just hurry and made mistake through lack of attention. -- Fedor Dikarev Rambler Internet Holding