From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 24 02:31:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B6A1065675; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:31:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EE18FC08; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:31:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9O2Tk9j083081; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:29:47 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:29:46 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20081023.202946.74666802.imp@bsdimp.com> To: des@des.no From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <868wsewzos.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <200810230151.m9N1ptUe044619@svn.freebsd.org> <20081023.190942.74668946.imp@bsdimp.com> <868wsewzos.fsf@ds4.des.no> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, marcel@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r184193 - in head/sys: arm/conf conf X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:31:10 -0000 From: Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav Subject: Re: svn commit: r184193 - in head/sys: arm/conf conf Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:26:43 +0200 > Warner Losh writes: > > We already have a better mechanism for including config files. We > > should be using that instead of poluting another port with the > > DEFAULTS file. > = > Should we even have DEFAULTS files at all? IMHO they just confuse > matters by introducing "stealth" options into your config. No. It is a useful transition tool when things become required, it isn't a useful long-term resting place for options. IMHO. Warner