From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Tue Mar 22 04:50:40 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD85AD6D6F
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 22 Mar 2016 04:50:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE052BC1
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 04:50:39 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <pi@opsec.eu>)
 id 1aiEH7-000Nu5-QP; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 05:50:37 +0100
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 05:50:37 +0100
From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@opsec.eu>
To: Carmel <carmel_ny@outlook.com>
Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: clamav problem
Message-ID: <20160322045037.GN35640@home.opsec.eu>
References: <FB142D1F-B9EE-4414-9380-2E6BE32B5984@FreeBSD.org>
 <BLU436-SMTP9119D2D6C3CB9A0EC9A7E0808D0@phx.gbl>
 <895F5CC6-9F5D-4A12-A8C3-E004F4157B4A@pozo.com>
 <BLU436-SMTP169B1685AB004BA7C80548F808E0@phx.gbl>
 <20160320114402.GH35640@home.opsec.eu>
 <BLU436-SMTP2C36C4A07B2F59B2956EB808E0@phx.gbl>
 <20160320154254.GI35640@home.opsec.eu>
 <BLU436-SMTP1278456D545EAC8F27A34D7808E0@phx.gbl>
 <CAN6yY1vj5Pi9uGVZVEQXs7FYCZEU8_qd2VmY00Gaz4dLRHRRbA@mail.gmail.com>
 <BLU436-SMTP4034719B612577C931FBF3808F0@phx.gbl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BLU436-SMTP4034719B612577C931FBF3808F0@phx.gbl>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 04:50:40 -0000

Hi!

> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:30:25 -0700, Kevin Oberman stated:
> 
> >Hmm. Let's see. A bug that may allow the defeat of a security
> >mechanism and allow a black-hat to do bad stuff before the bug con
> >even be looked at. Why would anyone have an issue with that? I mean,
> >don't we all want more zero-day vulnerabilities? (Sorry, Guess I put
> >on my sarcasm hat today.)
> 
> You are right. Hell, if I had cancer why should the doctor tell me if
> there is no cure for it. By the way, you must be a government employee.
> You know, the type thats wants to keep everything secret but pry into
> everyone else's life.

The problem report is now public, btw. No need to get personal 8-)

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         4 years to go !