From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Oct 13 21:25:02 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA24804 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 13 Oct 1996 21:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from solar.os.com (craigs@solar.os.com [199.232.136.65]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA24783 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 1996 21:24:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from craigs@localhost) by solar.os.com (8.7/8.7.0) id AAA09518; Mon, 14 Oct 1996 00:51:36 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 00:51:35 -0400 From: Craig Shrimpton Subject: Re: Freebsd? To: *MONEY* cc: questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <3261B756.5FFD@jlb.ml.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 13 Oct 1996, *MONEY* wrote: > Hi. > Forgive me > after reading your page > I still don't undderstand why I should get FreebSd > I'm currently running win95 on a Pentium/100 with 24 ram > would frebsd enhance performance? > can I still run Dos? > > What do you want to do? If Win95 does everything you need then why switch? Don't think in terms of one OS is better than another. That's just not the case. It's the application, not the OS that's important. -Craig +-----------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Craig Shrimpton | e-mail: craigs@os.com | | Orbit Systems | information: info@os.com | | Worcester, MA 508.753.8776 | http://www.os.com/ | +-----------------------------------+------------------------------------+