From owner-freebsd-ports Sat May 12 20: 5:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from femail11.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail11.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.107]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9959037B43F for ; Sat, 12 May 2001 20:05:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pat@databits.net) Received: from bsod ([24.5.63.190]) by femail11.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010513030552.GXFB22926.femail11.sdc1.sfba.home.com@bsod>; Sat, 12 May 2001 20:05:52 -0700 Message-ID: <004f01c0db59$9e6fe740$0200a8c0@bsod> From: "Patrick Li" To: "David W. Chapman Jr." , References: <01b601c0db3c$5b02ba40$931576d8@inethouston.net> <002d01c0db41$70cdda30$0200a8c0@bsod> <01c201c0db57$7273c000$931576d8@inethouston.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 23:05:51 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2465.0003 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2465.0003 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hehe, people will accept it just like x11-toolkits/gtk12 and x11-toolkits/gtk13. Between gtk12 and gtk13's pkg-descr, gtk13 gives a warning that its unstable or a development version, but samba and samba-devel pkg-descr is the exact same. On samba.org 2.2.x is already pronounced stable, people would get confused as to why it is still net/samba-devel (Just some crazy thoughts). Patrick Li ----- Original Message ----- From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Patrick Li" ; Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 10:50 PM Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 > samba20 and samba22 has been proposed, byt some people are rejecting it. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Patrick Li" > To: "David W. Chapman Jr." ; > > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 7:12 PM > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 > > > > how about samba20 and samba22 and change description in pkg-descr to not > > confuse people. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David W. Chapman Jr." > > To: "John Polstra" ; "Ade Lovett" > > Cc: ; ; > > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 7:36 PM > > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 > > > > > > > So how do we have both ports exist without confusing people by keeping > > samba > > > 2.2.0 as samba devel, because I've gotten a few emails about people > > > wondering about its stability. > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message