From owner-freebsd-security Wed Oct 9 8: 4: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC9137B401 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:04:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zardoc.esmtp.org (adsl-63-195-85-27.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.195.85.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB8243E42 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:04:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ca@zardoc.esmtp.org) Received: from zardoc.esmtp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zardoc.esmtp.org (8.12.7.Beta1/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g99F3fMN011570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ca@localhost) by zardoc.esmtp.org (8.12.7.Beta1/8.12.3/Submit) id g99F3fiE004484 for freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:03:41 -0700 From: Claus Assmann To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sendmail trojan...? Message-ID: <20021009080341.A26616@zardoc.esmtp.org> Reply-To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG References: <3DA3AE76.1070006@deevil.homeunix.org> <20021009142546.GA27227@darkstar.doublethink.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20021009142546.GA27227@darkstar.doublethink.cx>; from jedgar@fxp.org on Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 10:25:46AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Oct 09, 2002, Chris Faulhaber wrote: > Yes, the source in the tree has been verified against the > signed tarball; plus, it was the configure script that was > backdoored which buildworld does not use. It was not the configure script. I'm wondering who came up with this rumor; please stop spreading it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message