From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 4 14:43:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FFB16A41F; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 14:43:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEE343D49; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 14:43:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [70.30.70.180]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4851A3C1D; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 07:43:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8A26F512E0; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:43:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:43:19 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dirk Meyer Message-ID: <20051004144319.GA71102@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200510040735.j947Z8rb069549@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200510040735.j947Z8rb069549@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/openssl Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:43:22 -0000 --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 07:35:08AM +0000, Dirk Meyer wrote: > dinoex 2005-10-04 07:35:07 UTC >=20 > FreeBSD ports repository >=20 > Modified files: > security/openssl Makefile=20 > Log: > - bump SHLIB version > The API of openssl 0.9.8 ist compatible but not identical. > This version bump might break build of all ports that try > to include the opessl in base at the same time. > That ports should be fixed. This change should probably have waited until after 6.0. It's going to have significant follow-on effects that may prevent me from fixing security vulnerabilities in 6.0-RELEASE packages. Do you think this will not be the case? Kris --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDQpUHWry0BWjoQKURAjvhAKCiWNJgo5t+yh/rGSSmqxeqOEWUrACgxrwX 7QXiztZMyNzIZjeqVHrlF0U= =roxd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--