From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Mar  9 02:35:31 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id CAA09228
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 9 Mar 1996 02:35:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chaini.sita.kiev.ua (sita-carrier.sita.kiev.ua [193.124.50.33])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA08674
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 1996 02:27:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tav.kiev.ua (tav-sita.tav.kiev.ua [194.135.250.33]) by chaini.sita.kiev.ua (Sendmail 8.who.cares/5)
           with ESMTP id MAA25184 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 1996 12:29:26 +0200
Received: (from root@localhost) by tav.kiev.ua (8.6.12/5) id MAA18336 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Sat, 9 Mar 1996 12:15:33 +0200
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
From: Oleg N Panashchenko <helg@tav.kiev.ua>
Organization: Maxis Labs
Date: Sat,  9 Mar 96 12:15:32 +0200
Message-Id: <AA4fLGnmeH@tav.kiev.ua>
Subject: Changes in Digiboard driver
X-Mailer: BML [UNIX Beauty Mail v.1.39]
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

I have made several patches to digiboard PC/X driver to make it
stable under 2.1. They are available at

ftp.cdrom.com/pub/FreeBSD/incoming/dgb_helg-Feb19.tgz
ftp.tav.kiev.ua/pub/unix/FreeBSD/dgb_helg-Feb19.tgz

Several sites use these patches, so they are (possibly) candidates to
-stable.

Shoud I apply them to -current? Is anybody else using digiboard under
FreeBSD to give me any response?

Oleg