From owner-freebsd-alpha Mon Jan 21 14: 3:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7FE037B405 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:03:37 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with UUCP id g0LM3OU00623; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 23:03:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely8.cicely.de) Received: from mail.cicely.de (cicely20.cicely.de [10.1.1.22]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g0LM4IZ9067517; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 23:04:18 +0100 (CET)?g (envelope-from ticso@cicely8.cicely.de) Received: from cicely8.cicely.de (cicely8.cicely.de [10.1.2.10]) by mail.cicely.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g0LM4HW15364; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 23:04:17 +0100 (CET) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely8.cicely.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0LM4HZ71777; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 23:04:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 23:04:16 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Andrew Gallatin Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.5-RC panic Message-ID: <20020121230416.B71666@cicely8.cicely.de> References: <20020121035556.D58301@cicely8.cicely.de> <15436.8686.765933.505738@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20020121172920.U58301@cicely8.cicely.de> <15436.30762.981497.880698@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15436.30762.981497.880698@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely8.cicely.de 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > I finally upgraded my crashbox to 4.5RC & I was able to duplicate the > problem here. I think I've fixed it with the following patch -- I > like it better than the first one because it is less complex & should > be faster in the common case. > > I've also tested it w/an old copy of tcsh that calls the old > sigreturn, so I don't think I've messed up signals. > > Comments? I'm not able to reproduce the problem with the second patch. I did not test the first one. Great to see this one fixed that quick. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message