From owner-freebsd-net Tue Mar 20 14:40: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA6437B71D for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:40:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from chimp.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.11.2/8.11.1) with SMTP id f2KMdm318916; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:39:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) From: Mike Tancsa To: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A few nasty bugs in the networking code Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:39:47 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20010319203104.L43447@comp.chem.msu.su> <200103191732.SAA85848@info.iet.unipi.it> <20010320212422.Q58464@comp.chem.msu.su> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 20 Mar 2001 15:10:25 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: >< = said: > >> Isn't it better to assign the IFT_ETHER type to the vlan interface? >> There might be other places in the code where vlans would behave >> unexpectedly because of their type... > >No, because SNMP and potentially other network management utilities >need to know about it. Is there a work around for the arp -d issue then ? ---Mike Mike Tancsa (mdtancsa@sentex.net) =09 Sentex Communications Corp, =09 Waterloo, Ontario, Canada "Given enough time, 100 monkeys on 100 routers=20 could setup a national IP network." (KDW2) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message