From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 01:48:16 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D81D16A41A for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:48:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (pearl.ibctech.ca [208.70.104.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3286913C467 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 70479 invoked by uid 1002); 13 Dec 2007 01:48:15 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(208.70.104.100):. Processed in 6.763049 secs); 13 Dec 2007 01:48:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.30.110?) (steve@ibctech.ca@208.70.104.100) by pearl.ibctech.ca with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 13 Dec 2007 01:48:08 -0000 Message-ID: <47608FE2.20707@ibctech.ca> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:50:26 -0500 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sten Daniel Soersdal References: <476086E2.5030402@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <476086E2.5030402@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: (postfix) SPAM filter? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:48:16 -0000 Sten Daniel Soersdal wrote: > We have a need for a relatively painless anti-spam solution that would > reduce the amount of incoming spam (via postfix mail router). The > problem is that i have little knowledge on what this actually means. > Googling reveals a whole "universe" of interesting ways but what should > i pursue? > The things that are important to me is: > > * Once it is setup then it would require no additional maintenance. > * Potential spam messages are marked with a special header that can be > filtered on user discretion on their local mail client software. > > Neither performance, scalability, license nor cost is of much importance > to me at this point. > > Any hints? No additional maintenance (less user add/delete)?: http://www.postini.com Unfortunately, it's been years since I've used their services so I can't remember if they have the ability to mark and pass. It's a hands-off solution that works. Steve