Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:00:58 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208561] [NEW PORT] sysutils/datadog: Datadog Cloud-Scale Monitoring agent Message-ID: <bug-208561-21822-UGDFjiISkC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-208561-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-208561-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208561 --- Comment #14 from Dave Cottlehuber <dch@freebsd.org> --- thanks uros for the work here! Other than a few tidy-ups this is a fantastic port. I'm tweaking it for v7 & USES=3Dgo:modules but other than that LGTM. on v7, there's 1 (docker related) dependency that doesn't fetch correctly; help wanted on figuring out how to manage that. Is it sufficient to remove = the line from modules, and the invoke ... command parameters? https://git.sr.ht/~dch/ports/tree/feature/datadog I'll add a patch tomorrow from this branch after some further work. Assuming that works, it needs to respect hier(7) to land in ports. Hopefully we can do th= is with some gentle patches in the source. assuming /usr/local/bin/dd-agent or similar, does it make more sense to use /var/run/datadog/... or /var/db/datadog/... for example for its runtime fil= es? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-208561-21822-UGDFjiISkC>