From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Sep 17 17:25:12 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA21762
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 17 Sep 1997 17:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usr04.primenet.com (tlambert@usr04.primenet.com [206.165.6.204])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA21757
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 17 Sep 1997 17:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from tlambert@localhost)
	by usr04.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA20055;
	Wed, 17 Sep 1997 17:25:01 -0700 (MST)
From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Message-Id: <199709180025.RAA20055@usr04.primenet.com>
Subject: Re: NFS client locking
To: mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith)
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 00:25:00 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199709172329.IAA00695@word.smith.net.au> from "Mike Smith" at Sep 18, 97 08:59:34 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > I would like to discuss NFS client locking implementation details.
> 
> [... much theory elided ...]
> 
> > Comments?
> 
> For whatever it's worth, it looks sound to me.  Do we have any 
> commentary from Doug on this?  I think that we'd greatly respect a 
> second opinion from someone with experience in this field.

I haven't heard from Doug in a while; no one has, AFAIK.  But
I'd like his comments on it as well as anyone else who wants to
throw in their two cents worth.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.