Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 08:04:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@info.iet.unipi.it> To: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, pavel@alum.mit.edu, nsayer@sftw.com, luigi@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposal for ethernet, bridging, netgraph Message-ID: <200004250604.IAA18486@info.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <200004250214.TAA30215@bubba.whistle.com> from Archie Cobbs at "Apr 24, 2000 07:14:44 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> OK, here's a patch ready for review & test.. this patch does one i generally like the patch. As you notice: > Most of these patches are straightforward, however a few are > more tricky.. in particular: > > - pci/if_de.c (what does TULIP_HASHONLY mean exactly?) > - dev/ed/if_ed.c (contained a BRIDGE optimization) > - dev/ie/if_ie.c (contained a BPF optimization) this is why i suggested having some way to preserve the old ether_input() behaviour, either by definining a new function which does the bpf/bridge stuff and then calls ether_input(), or maybe by using some special argument to ether_input() to tell that we want the 'new' behaviour (one which immediately comes to mind: use eh == NULL to mean that we want the 'new' behaviour, since the ethernet header for bridging/bpf to work needs to be in the mbuf.) cheers luigi -----------------------------------+------------------------------------- Luigi RIZZO, luigi@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa TEL/FAX: +39-050-568.533/522 . via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy) Mobile +39-347-0373137 -----------------------------------+------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004250604.IAA18486>