Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:22:03 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Jose Borquez <bsdlists@sbcglobal.net> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Ports vs Packages Message-ID: <20051213212203.GA60590@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <439F3A4D.2060704@sbcglobal.net> References: <439F3A4D.2060704@sbcglobal.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:17:01PM -0800, Jose Borquez wrote: > When installing the same software using either the ports or a package=20 > do they both install in the same locations? For Example installing=20 > Apache from ports on one server and installing Apache from packages on=20 > another server would still use the same locations for both? The same. A package is just a port built with default options. Kris --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDnzt7Wry0BWjoQKURAohAAKC74Kah8uRkzYfeQG6mWOHgvHQyFACgn/mW tj2M0rqhza6rrvBeGyumlFU= =+6vU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051213212203.GA60590>