From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 15 04:55:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5659816A4DE for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08FD043D5D for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:55:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c59so1577289pyc for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:55:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=c6BaKqGnVXfJZfaXGq9PYzo81jfinRVhbsGxQtKD/8xtaAxeEHca9dcUu+u9b352jAd4LqC1OJ+XzppyUoaKX+NDG5FLPNJNbvfaFTvXTYXRRyHFsNi7lHuBYJD7tGzTOeemdd7atFf64owlf75k7ugpC8A7TgkWXKe9tAf3G/4= Received: by 10.35.45.1 with SMTP id x1mr14740248pyj; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:55:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.105.10 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:55:22 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060814234414.GA57035@hades.panopticon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060814234414.GA57035@hades.panopticon> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 115b0a9f6ce88746 Subject: Re: ATTENTION: is the way DESTDIR was introduced completely wrong? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:55:25 -0000 On 8/15/06, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * I don't think DESTDIR compatibility can be tested automatically, so > this would make freebsd user's life easier (user will be sure that after he > installs ports into [jail|other freebsd installation mounted via > nfs|locally] being set corresponging DESTDIR, nothing will break). > Without such variable, he'll never be sure. Actually, "make install package && make deinstall && pkg_add" might be an acceptable as a test in many cases.